Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact

Construction Superintentant Files Harassment Lawsuit After Noose Hung in Workplace

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin

July 10, 2015 – An African-American assistant superintendent has filed a racial harassment lawsuit against his former employer, after the superintendent assaulted him with a noose and made threatening and racist comments. As documented in photos and videos taken at the time of harassment, while working in Lafayette, the employee (who is identified for his safety only as Nicholas P.) was forced to confront a noose in the construction site office of SRM Development LLC. The noose hung in the office for two days and was not removed until the victim sent pictures of the noose, via email, to company co-owner Dee McGonigle at SRM headquarters in Spokane, Washington.

As the complaint describes, the harassment began on August 7, 2014, when Dan Schaeffer, a superintendent, threw the noose end of a rope over a cubicle wall in the office. After the noose hit Nicholas P.’s hardhat, Schaeffer loudly asked other employees, “Did I get him?” and added, “that’s how we do them in Idaho.” The noose remained dangling on the cubicle wall and Nicholas P. left work early because of the incident. When he returned the next day, Nicholas P. found the noose still hanging over his cubicle wall. Later that day, Gabe McCarthy, an SRM project engineer, moved the noose to the middle of the room, telling Nicholas P. that it would fit him better there.

The racial threats and taunting did not end there. According to the allegations of the Complaint, when Nicholas P. returned to the office after a lunch break, he found that a police sketch of a black man, on which his name had been written, had been hung in the loop of the noose. The sketch had been previously left at the office by the police, who were investigating a theft. Terrified by the escalating situation, Nicholas P. left work. That weekend, he emailed the photos to McGonigle. The following week, when he was required to work with Schaeffer, the superintendent asked Nicholas, “why did you snitch?” Later that day Schaeffer bragged that he was a good “sniper” and said “I can’t wait to bring my rifle down here.” Schaeffer made these comments while looking at Nicholas P, who understood these comments to be a threat to his life.

Leslie F. Levy and Jean Hyams of Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP represent Nicholas P. in the case which was filed in Alameda County Superior Court on July 9, 2015.

In conjunction with filing the case, attorneys for Nicholas P. have released a few of the photos taken by their client. Leslie Levy commented, “These images should send a chill down the spine of every American as a reminder that racism and violence against African-Americans are not just things from the past. There is no denying that racism still infects our society. As hard as it is to look at these images, it was important to expose what is happening in American workplaces, even a liberal state like California.”

The lawsuit includes claims for violations of California’s hate crimes statute, assault, battery and racial harassment in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.

Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP is an Oakland-based firm specializing in representing employees. A copy of the complaint filed it Nicholas P. v. SRM can be accessed by clicking here.

Related Posts:

  • If working from home is affecting your mental health, it's time to ask for accommodation
  • Special Agent with over 25 years of experience in law enforcement sues California Department of Justice, alleging gender…
  • LVBH client settles lawsuit against San Rafael City Schools
  • California Corrections Department to pay $2.3 million to decorated special agents for claims of unrelenting gender bias

More Posts

  • Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

    Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

  • LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

    LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

  • LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

    LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

  • LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

    LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

  • Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

    Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

  • Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

    Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

  • LVBH attorneys named once again to the 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list

    LVBH attorneys named once again to the 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list

  • LVBH client settles lawsuit against San Rafael City Schools

    LVBH client settles lawsuit against San Rafael City Schools

  • LVBH clients featured in Berkeleyside article

    LVBH clients featured in Berkeleyside article

  • Wendy Musell interviewed on pay disparities

    Wendy Musell interviewed on pay disparities

Tags

#metoo award civil rights class action COVID defamation disability discrimination employee rights employment agreement employment arbitration agreements employment law employment lawyer blog equal pay ethnicity harassment failure to prevent harassment family medical leave forced arbitration gender discrimination human resources immigrant rights mandatory arbitration medical leave retaliation minimum wage misclassification national origin harassment Oakland Raiders cheerleader lawsuit public employees race discrimination racial harassment reasonable accommodation retaliation retaliation lawsuit sacramento sexual abuse sexual assault sexual harassment Super Lawyers uc regents University of California wage and hour wage theft whistleblowers women lawyers working families wrongful termination

LVBH Logo

CONTACT US

510-318-7700
info@levyvinick.com

Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, California 94612

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Press Releases

Copyright © 2023 Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams · website: Amanda McCoy · Log in

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same.

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same. The photos on this website do not reflect actual attorney-client interactions.