Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact

If my employer gives me an arbitration agreement, do I have to sign it?

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin

Over the last twenty years, it has become increasingly common for companies to require their employees to sign arbitration agreements.  These agreements require that all disputes related to someone’s employment (including claims for discrimination or harassment) be resolved in private arbitration, rather than in a courtroom, which is open to members of the public.  And, typically, these arbitration agreements provide that the decision of the arbitrator is not subject to judicial review, which means that the decision of the arbitrator is final, even if the arbitrator misinterpreted the law, or misunderstood the facts.

Typically, an arbitration agreement is presented to someone at the time that they are hired (either as part of a longer employment agreement, or as a separate document).  But, sometimes an company decides to ask current employees to sign an agreement.  In either case, people often wonder:  do I have to sign the agreement?  Sadly, if signing an employment agreement is a condition of employment — regardless of whether you are about to join the company or you are already an employee — then you have to sign it if you want the job.  Under California law, as well as the law of every other state, an employer can refuse to hire you (or can terminate you) if you refuse to agree to arbitrate all of your employment disputes.

At the same time, California law requires that an arbitration agreement must include certain terms to be enforceable.  For example, the employer must pay all of the costs of arbitration, including the fees for the arbitrators, which can easily be tens of thousands of dollars.  And, an arbitration agreement cannot limit an employee’s rights to “discovery” or the damages that can be recovered.  Moreover, in recent years, state and federal courts in California courts have refused to enforce provisions in arbitration agreements that prevent employees from bringing class actions.  However, not a single court in California has held that it is improper to require an individual to sign an arbitration agreement.

Related Posts:

  • Special Agent with over 25 years of experience in law enforcement sues California Department of Justice, alleging gender… April 15, 2022
  • Rebecca Kagin moderates panel on advocating for essential workers during the pandemic August 16, 2021
  • Hilary Hammell quoted in Aljazeera report on Tesla racism trial in San Francisco September 25, 2021
  • LVBH wins appellate victory for courageous #MeToo survivor October 2, 2021

More Posts

  • Fair Housing Council honors Leslie Levy with Unsung Heroine Award for pioneering work to combat sexual harassment in housing

    Fair Housing Council honors Leslie Levy with Unsung Heroine Award for pioneering work to combat sexual harassment in housing

  • CEB Features Jean Hyams Speaking on Implicit Bias and Jury Selection

    CEB Features Jean Hyams Speaking on Implicit Bias and Jury Selection

  • Rebecca Kagin selected for Sonoma Magazine’s Lawyers of Excellence Two Years in a Row

    Rebecca Kagin selected for Sonoma Magazine’s Lawyers of Excellence Two Years in a Row

  • Berkeley Law program features Jean Hyams on settling sexual harassment cases

    Berkeley Law program features Jean Hyams on settling sexual harassment cases

  • Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

    Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

  • LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

    LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

  • LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

    LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

  • LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

    LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

  • Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

    Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

  • Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

    Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

Tags

#metoo award civil rights class action COVID defamation disability discrimination employee rights employment agreement employment arbitration agreements employment law employment lawyer blog equal pay ethnicity harassment failure to prevent harassment family medical leave forced arbitration gender discrimination human resources immigrant rights mandatory arbitration medical leave retaliation minimum wage misclassification national origin harassment Oakland Raiders cheerleader lawsuit public employees race discrimination racial harassment reasonable accommodation retaliation retaliation lawsuit sacramento sexual abuse sexual assault sexual harassment Super Lawyers uc regents University of California wage and hour wage theft whistleblowers women lawyers working families wrongful termination

LVBH Logo

CONTACT US

510-318-7700
info@levyvinick.com

Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, California 94612

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Press Releases

Copyright © 2023 Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams · website: Amanda McCoy · Log in

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same.

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same. The photos on this website do not reflect actual attorney-client interactions.