Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact

Fintech Software Executive Files Lawsuit for Gender Discrimination, Denial of Equal Pay And Retaliation Lawsuit Against Equity Management Provider Carta

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin
Emily Kramer

July 21, 2020 – SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. – Emily Kramer, former Carta executive and VP of Marketing, filed suit against the equity-management software maker today, alleging that Carta discriminated against her on the basis of gender, retaliated against her, wrongfully terminated her in violation of public policy, violated the California Equal Pay Act, and failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent discrimination, retaliation, and harassment.

Kramer is represented by Sharon Vinick and Hilary Hammell of Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP, a boutique law firm in Oakland which specializes in representing employees in workplace disputes.

Carta, which is now valued at more than $3 billion, having raised more than $600 million from leading investors like Andreesen Horowitz, Lightspeed Ventures, and Goldman Sachs, promotes itself as a company dedicated to making corporate ownership more equal and democratic. As the suit alleges, Carta sought to establish itself as a leading voice and “brand” in exposing unfair equity practices, specifically gender inequities, and it did so under the leadership of Plaintiff Emily Kramer. According to the lawsuit filed today in San Francisco County Superior Court, during the same time Carta was claiming leadership on equity practices, the company paid Kramer less than men in similar positions, issued Kramer less equity than similarly-situated males, repeatedly refused to promote her while offering promotions to less qualified men, subjected her to sexist and subjective criticism about her “style” (despite her strong performance), and responded with escalating hostility when she pointed out these inequities.

Ms. Kramer explains about her time at Carta, “I thought my performance would speak for itself and I could use my voice to drive change internally, while educating people about fair equity practices externally. I wrestled with what I considered hypocrisy at Carta daily. I knew we weren’t interviewing or hiring more women onto the executive team even as the company was exhorting others to make change. I knew my compensation wasn’t fair. From what I experienced, this was due to my gender and the expectation that I was supposed to act a certain way because I’m a woman. I stayed as long as I could because I cared about my team and educating people about equity. I kept going thinking things would improve. But the more I spoke up, the worse it got.”

Sharon Vinick, lead counsel on the case says, “Carta’s mission of reducing income inequality and democratizing ownership of corporations is a laudable goal. But, we believe that equal treatment of employees must start from the inside. Based on the detailed allegations in the complaint, we believe the evidence will show that Carta’s discriminatory treatment of Ms. Kramer fell far short of matching its stated goals.”

Kramer wrote a blog post about her experiences, which is available to read on Medium. An article regarding the lawsuit was recently published by Bloomberg.

For further information regarding the lawsuit, call Sharon Vinick at 510-318-7702.

Related Posts:

  • Special Agent with over 25 years of experience in law enforcement sues California Department of Justice, alleging gender… April 15, 2022
  • LVBH client settles lawsuit against San Rafael City Schools June 6, 2022
  • California Corrections Department to pay $2.3 million to decorated special agents for claims of unrelenting gender bias April 15, 2021
  • LVBH wins appellate victory for courageous #MeToo survivor October 2, 2021

More Posts

  • CEB Features Jean Hyams Speaking on Implicit Bias and Jury Selection

    CEB Features Jean Hyams Speaking on Implicit Bias and Jury Selection

  • Rebecca Kagin selected for Sonoma Magazine’s Lawyers of Excellence Two Years in a Row

    Rebecca Kagin selected for Sonoma Magazine’s Lawyers of Excellence Two Years in a Row

  • Berkeley Law program features Jean Hyams on settling sexual harassment cases

    Berkeley Law program features Jean Hyams on settling sexual harassment cases

  • Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

    Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

  • LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

    LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

  • LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

    LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

  • LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

    LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

  • Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

    Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

  • Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

    Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

  • LVBH attorneys named once again to the 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list

    LVBH attorneys named once again to the 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list

Tags

#metoo award civil rights class action COVID defamation disability discrimination employee rights employment agreement employment arbitration agreements employment law employment lawyer blog equal pay ethnicity harassment failure to prevent harassment family medical leave forced arbitration gender discrimination human resources immigrant rights mandatory arbitration medical leave retaliation minimum wage misclassification national origin harassment Oakland Raiders cheerleader lawsuit public employees race discrimination racial harassment reasonable accommodation retaliation retaliation lawsuit sacramento sexual abuse sexual assault sexual harassment Super Lawyers uc regents University of California wage and hour wage theft whistleblowers women lawyers working families wrongful termination

LVBH Logo

CONTACT US

510-318-7700
info@levyvinick.com

Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, California 94612

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Press Releases

Copyright © 2023 Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams · website: Amanda McCoy · Log in

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same.

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same. The photos on this website do not reflect actual attorney-client interactions.