Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact

Rape Survivor’s Lawsuit Leads to New Rules for Preventing Sexual Assault for Major School District

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
Linkedin
Yellow school bus

As part of the settlement of a high-profile Title IX lawsuit brought by Virginia M., a former student, the Sacramento City Unified School District has agreed to sweeping programmatic changes in how it will respond to reports of sexual assault and harassment. Signed by the Superintendent of the District with the authorization of the District’s Governing Board, the new policies will impact nearly 50,000 students attending schools in the District.

After Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP and its co-counsel, Equal Rights Advocates, filed suit in state court, the District paid a monetary settlement of $400,000 to the student in the fall of 2019.  However, the settlement required more than money. It also required SCUSD to work with Equal Rights Advocates to draft, implement, and monitor progress of new policies for responding to reports of sexual assault and harassment.  After months of further negotiations, a comprehensive programmatic agreement has been reached, including expanded training for students and staff, increased support services and protections for students, and at least one on-site Title IX specialist at every school in the District.

The suit which brought about these programmatic changes, alleged that when school officials found out about the rape, they effectively suspended the victim, escorting Virginia off campus and directing her not to return for the rest of her Junior year. Meanwhile, the two students who raped her remained in school completely unaffected. According to the lawsuit, school officials broke several federal and state laws, including Title IX, the federal law banning gender discrimination in education by: failing to inform Virginia of her rights; discouraging her from taking legal action; failing to provide any academic support or counseling; failing to provide options for avoiding her assailants at school (other than kicking her out); not conducting a Title IX investigation; failing to take effective action to stop the bullying, threats, and harassment she experienced when she returned to school; and failing to provide any accommodations for the resulting trauma symptoms that interfered with her education.

The lawsuit received media attention and resulted in hundreds of students protesting how the District handled sexual harassment. With the momentum of the #MeToo movement driving industries, communities and governments to change how we address sexual harassment, students joined the fight for meaningful change. Virginia was committed to making sure what happened to her never happened again, and insisted that part of the settlement include SCUSD’s commitment to genuine culture change and best practices by entering into a separate agreement with ERA to assess and revise SCUSD’s policies, procedures and practices related to discrimination and harassment.

Additional highlights from the newly signed agreement include:

  • SCUSD agreed to limit the rights of police officers and school administrators to question students – including the accused – without their parents and/or a support person of their choosing present.
  • Counselors and support people who are trained and experienced in how sexual violence affects K-12 students specifically
  • Interactive, and student-led trainings for students about affirmative consent and how to recognize and report sexual harassment, sexual assault, and other gender-based harassment
  • An annual Climate Survey assessing from students, parents and teachers the prevalence of gender-based discrimination that will include mechanisms to asses students’ attitudes and knowledge of their rights, whether gender-based discrimination was underreported and why, and how experiences of gender-based discrimination interfere with students’ education
  • SCUSD’s commitment to genuine culture change and best practices (not just legal compliance)
  • Policies that address ALL gender-based conduct (including discrimination targeting LGBTQI+ students) both on campus and off.
  • SCUSD will affirmatively and regularly check-in with the victim-student during and after the investigation, irrespective of the ultimate findings of the investigation, to determine whether further gender-based discrimination has occurred or whether additional supportive measures are needed
  • ERA will monitor SCUSD’s progress, compliance and the effectiveness of changes implemented under the agreement for three years

This is a significant victory for the students of SCUSD and the District has promised to comply with both the letter and the spirit of Title IX and analogous California laws.  LVBH thanks and congratulates Equal Rights Advocates for their continuing commitment to fight for gender justice in workplaces and schools across the country.

Related Posts:

  • LVBH client settles lawsuit against San Rafael City Schools June 6, 2022
  • LVBH wins appellate victory for courageous #MeToo survivor October 2, 2021
  • California Corrections Department to pay $2.3 million to decorated special agents for claims of unrelenting gender bias April 15, 2021
  • Special Agent with over 25 years of experience in law enforcement sues California Department of Justice, alleging gender… April 15, 2022

More Posts

  • CEB Features Jean Hyams Speaking on Implicit Bias and Jury Selection

    CEB Features Jean Hyams Speaking on Implicit Bias and Jury Selection

  • Rebecca Kagin selected for Sonoma Magazine’s Lawyers of Excellence Two Years in a Row

    Rebecca Kagin selected for Sonoma Magazine’s Lawyers of Excellence Two Years in a Row

  • Berkeley Law program features Jean Hyams on settling sexual harassment cases

    Berkeley Law program features Jean Hyams on settling sexual harassment cases

  • Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

    Wendy Musell weighs in on gig workers as employees

  • LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

    LVBH recognized as a “Best Law Firm” in Northern California

  • LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

    LA Times calls on Wendy Musell to discuss the impact of a sexual misconduct settlement

  • LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

    LVBH adds two more members to its superhero legal team

  • Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

    Wendy Musell discusses California bill requiring salary ranges on job listings

  • Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

    Plaintiff Magazine spotlights Darci Burrell

  • LVBH attorneys named once again to the 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list

    LVBH attorneys named once again to the 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers list

Tags

#metoo award civil rights class action COVID defamation disability discrimination employee rights employment agreement employment arbitration agreements employment law employment lawyer blog equal pay ethnicity harassment failure to prevent harassment family medical leave forced arbitration gender discrimination human resources immigrant rights mandatory arbitration medical leave retaliation minimum wage misclassification national origin harassment Oakland Raiders cheerleader lawsuit public employees race discrimination racial harassment reasonable accommodation retaliation retaliation lawsuit sacramento sexual abuse sexual assault sexual harassment Super Lawyers uc regents University of California wage and hour wage theft whistleblowers women lawyers working families wrongful termination

LVBH Logo

CONTACT US

510-318-7700
info@levyvinick.com

Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 1300
Oakland, California 94612

  • Overview
  • Attorneys
  • Our Work
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Press Releases

Copyright © 2023 Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams · website: Amanda McCoy · Log in

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same.

Disclaimer

Nothing in this website is intended in any way to form an attorney-client relationship or any other contract. It is designed solely to provide general information about the practice at Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP.

Be mindful of any deadlines you have approaching that relate to your legal situation, and make sure that you meet them. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP does not assume any responsibility for advice given regarding any aspect of your case until you have a signed legal services agreement engaging the firm’s representation.

Though the firm provides free initial consultations, the firm retains complete discretion in every case to decide whether or not to provide a consultation to any person. Levy Vinick Burrell Hyams LLP makes no guarantees, warranties, or predictions about your case, and past success at the firm does not ensure future results will be the same. The photos on this website do not reflect actual attorney-client interactions.